cuckoos nest essays

cuckoo's nest essays Should Hamlet kill himself, kill his uncle or live the rest of his life suffering through massive pain and fear. The quote to be or not to be is Hamlet saying that hes felling pain from his fathers death and his mothers superficial marriage with her husbands brother. When reading this act it fells like Hamlet wants to kill himself because it would be the best way to relieve all the I disagree with Hamlet because I think killing yourself doesnt solve anything. I think Hamlet should go with his first plan and kill his uncle. Maybe get payback at his uncle by killing his father by putting poison in his ear but Hamlet doesnt know that for sure because that ghost could have been the devil and told Hamlet wrong. So maybe he shouldnt go with that plan, well I really dont know what he must do. I really think Hamlet ought to stick it out and get over his fathers death and live his life happy, not wearying too much. I think that his fathers death misleads his philosophy on life more than his mothers unstudied marriage. When that ghost of Hamlets Father came out and talk to him, Hamlet was scared and didnt know what to do. As the ghost spoke to him, he told Hamlet how his father was killed and who killed him, Hamlet right away wanted to kill his uncle. As the day went on Hamlet was scared to kill his uncle cause maybe that ghost was the devil and not the ghost of his father. A person can do whatever they want to do to work at being happy. People do fun things that they like to do. Some people read a book, ride a dirt bike, jog, take a bike ride, anything that makes a individual happy. I ride my dirt bike when Im depressed and sad because its fun and it something that will always make me happy. ...

Charismatic Leadership

Charismatic Leadership Abstract What is Leadership? Today it is important to understanding various leadership styles and the truth behind them due to diversification in the workforce. Different styles enable one to fairly deal with developments in any discipline of management or leadership. The style of leadership is a main concern over employees’ performance.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Charismatic Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Leadership is the ability to steer off activities of a team to success. There is need to explore various theories and applications utilized in leading diverse groups of personnel especially different age groups. The application includes the characteristics or models used for measuring leadership styles and strategies. This paper forms a significant over-view of the assumption that charismatic leadership is a transformational way of modernizing intellectual governance. It also forms an analy sis of the claim that the charismatic leaders are inspirational and transforms their group members for better performances. What are the challenges facing the charismatic leaders? Does failure to establish leadership qualities cause failure of missions? The paper forms an analysis of the aspects that forms, energize or transforms leaders with a close reference to charismatic style of leadership. Recognizing leadership Leadership is guidance or assistance procedures mainly concern with the way people create rapport, communicate and live by the significances for life (Hargreaves, 2003). According to Hargreaves (2003), for a leadership style to be effective, it is imperative to practice some key governance values. The process of leadership in an organization is considerably complex due to the high expectations placed by people regarding their different needs, synergy or energy levels, expectations, experiences, and technological advancements among other aspects. The group differences b ring about diverse aspects, thus placing very high expectations and challenges to a leadership style. Arguably, the leadership style has a reciprocating nature; whereby the leader has needs, and the followers have their own different requirements with the expectation that each party meets the other’s needs. In most instances, the leadership style fails because these needs lack measurable elements or factors to meet expectations.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Overview of charismatic Leadership According to Northhouse (2009), a charismatic leader has a strong commitment to an exceptional style of leaving such as enhancing sacredness. This person is a hero because of the excellent and recommendable character that she/he portrays. The leader has a personal characteristic or leadership qualities of ‘charisma,’ that easily differentiates her/him fro m others. This persona trait bequeaths the leader some unique treatment or perception comparable to the treatment accorded to the superhuman or supernatural beings. The leader gives an impression of existence of some exceptional qualities or powers that are inaccessible by the ordinary human beings (Clark, 2008). The individual therefore enjoys a treatment of a heroic status as a leader because of the exemplary regards due to the special qualities. Ultimate judgment over the existence of these charismatic qualities in a person lacks proverbial proof from an ethical or aesthetic point of view, and therefore is naturally indifferent. In relation to Clark (2008), logically, charismatic leadership entails ability to extract or break down complex ideas to smaller units that are easier for others to understand. This is a remarkable ability to illustrate complexity using symbols, images, stories, metaphors or analogies. The leadership style also entails the ability to appreciate existence of challenges and risks and therefore such a leader is always eager to engage some disputes. Optimism is equally a trait of a charismatic leader because she/he is constantly ready to combat conventions, because they always engage a distinctive idiosyncratic nature. Although without a guarantee for correctness or success, the charismatic leaders have unique guidance qualities to inspire people’s trust, believes and faith (Daft and Marcic, 2008). The leaders are the companies’ or organization’s heroines/heroes, because of the ability to coordinate change, engage new implementations, inspire renewals and gunner extraordinary performances from other organizational members. Various attributes link the charismatic leadership style to the transformational way of governance such as, sensitivity to the group members or the environment, ability to take risks and capability to perceive and articulate outcomes. Consistent with Heifetz’s writing (2004), the main diffe rence between the two types of leadership falls upon focus.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Charismatic Leadership specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The transformational leaders focus on changing the organizations or the leaders, while the charismatic leader has a focus on commitment and devotion both to the persona values as well as those of the group members without the need of changing anything. Charismatic leader’s goals depend on motivation and leader’s vision. They are concern of others but the main concern first falls on their needs. Their personal values are very significant and of good intentions, hence elevated to the entire company or organization later. Historical background of charismatic leadership Initially there were three types of leadership styles also accorded the term dominations, classes or authority due to the differences in social perceptions. First, the charismatic leadership sty le had a basis on the family or the religious setting. The feudal or the common traditional system of leadership entailed patriarchic nature while thirdly is the bureaucratic or legal type of leadership that mainly dealt with modernized law that supports democratic system of bureaucracy. Charismatic nature of governance comes out strongly because of the defined nature of dominance, strong desire to form influences, strong sense over the importance of moral values and self-confidence (Northhouse, 2009). The charismatic leadership also portrays some unique attributes that makes it different from other leadership styles such as the ability to articulate vision for a firm, being sensitive to the world’s nature especially the environment and people’s needs, ability to take risks and engagement of some activists related behaviours. Application of charismatic leadership According to (Yukl, 2006) today people have accorded the charismatic type of leadership a characteristic of exaggeration because of the impression the management process enacts on performance expectations. Arguably, Adolf Hitler as well as Mahatma Gandhi could reasonably qualify as charismatic leaders, but today the administrative process considers a charismatic leader as one who fills the environment with energy and positive reinforcements without the need to learn the transaction behind such performances. The inspiration to others therefore disqualifies the negative corroborations by some leaders (Yukl, 2006). The leader inspires others positively by encouraging them to follow the footsteps, while others work in the aim of inspiring the charismatic leader. There is inspiration to work smarter in the aim of acquiring success.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Management is one of the most important applications of charismatic leadership especially during the difficult circumstances, when the firm or organization is in need of major changes. The charismatic leaders develop excellent solutions during the crisis management situations (Yukl, 2006). Representation for charismatic leadership The leader ought to have an engagement to continual assessment procedure in the line of duty and have mechanisms to assist in formulation of visions. Secondly is the ability to communicate the formulated visions or organization’s goals. This requires the leaders to have motivational and good persuasive arguments. Thirdly is the need for an ability to build subordinate trust through enhanced commitment. The staff must have the desire to support the goals set out by the leader. There is call for more than just compulsive administration, thus the leader has to enhance transparency and show the viability of the goals through taking risks and enhanced se lf-sacrifice without conservative expertise. Lastly, the leader has to focus on achievement of the set objectives or vision by ensuring perceptible aspects of good role models, empowerment and expertise tactics among the subordinates (Yukl, 2006). Strengths of the charismatic leadership style The results of the endeavours are relatively strong with unchallenged intensity over subordinate obedience to their leader. During the difficult times and experiences, the style is more useful because of the ability to provide ample turnaround point. It is possible to consider the system as extremely effective due to the possibility of a right vision of the leader or other rhetorical capabilities. The system that engages the charismatic leadership style brings in an energetic nature, clear vision and commendable perspective. Benefits of charismatic leadership The charismatic leadership style is more useful during the short-term projects because they are worth the risk of involving a leader. Suc h projects probably requires strong energy and talented leaders thus the need for a charismatic leader. In line with (Yukl, 2006), the charismatic traits are special but a leader can acquire most of the traits such as self-confidence or communication skills that involves effective vocabulary. Confidence is transferable from the leader to the subordinate. Limitations of charismatic leadership When the system is made of very strong levels of administrations lacking proper delegation, there is a tendency of gathering a workgroup made of weak people. Secondly, it is very rare to find leaders who have these charismatic skills and attributes. The rare situation of existence of the special cases may be the root cause of narcissism aspects such as insensitivity to others and lack of reality on the undertakings. When a leader lacks some conflicting point of views within the group setting, they lack accountability. The charisma value enables them to develop good intentions on others in the ai m of achieving transformation in the company; bad intentions can however deceive others. The unpredictability of the leaders makes the charismatic system of leadership potentially precarious. Group members under the charismatic leadership style, view success in a close relation to the leader thus end up depending fully on the leader. Lastly, the leader is the main catalyst on the development of the group thus a sudden step down is likely to bring down the group or cause loss of enthusiasm. Conclusion Charismatic leadership involves grace and appeals in the aim of bring together followers. Leaders need self believe others to admire their personality. The style of charismatic leadership involves attraction of the subordinate support through impression of personality and charm as opposed to power and external influences. There trait to improve the feeling of appreciation among the group members becomes one of the main aim of a charismatic leader because they pay attention to the enviro nment, in the aim of picking up the moods and individual’s concerns within a large audience. Management of the image is of grate concern to these leaders. Self sacrifice and risking enhances trust and development of personal skills. Persuasion and use of body as well as verbal language such as use of symbolism and metaphors is equally important to enhance the desired effect. Today the political, religious and cult leaders mimic the charismatic styles of governance in the aim of gathering large number of followers. This is an indicative that one is able to increase charismatic skills through acquisition and practice. Formation of a very distinct and clear group among others enables charismatic leaders to enhance their image. References Clark, D. R. (2008, August 21). Leadership style. [online] Journal of Social Psychology, pp. 221-228. Available at http://nwlink.com/~Donclark/leader/leadstl.html Daft, R.L. and Marcic, D. (2008) Understanding Management. Cengage Learning, Harg reaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Publishes. Print Heifetz R A. (2004). Leadership without Easy Answers. London, UK: Harvard University Press. Print Northhouse, P. G. (2009). Leadership: Theory and Practice. London, UK: SAGE Publication press. Print Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations. New York, NY: Prentice Hall Publishers. Print

Adoption process Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Adoption process - Research Paper Example The process is grueling and requires the completion of paper works which requires the evaluation of both the child’s and the foster parents background thus determining a common ground between the two parties. Additionally, the agreement requires the permission from the biological parents of the child who in this case must surrender all their parenting responsibilities and rights to the new parents. Adoption is a serious process that requires appropriate consideration of all the possible factors including the effects of the process on the child before inception as the essay below analyzes. The process differs from guardianship in that unlike in guardianship where one assumes the parenting rights and responsibilities for a period; in adoption, the transfer is permanent and irreversible. Guardianship occurs when a relation or a Good Samaritan offers to take care of a child for a specific duration before they either return the child to their biological parents or release them as a dults into the society (Jarratt 211). This is not the case in an adoption process since the transfer is permanent and the adopted children have specific privileges that parents accord their biological children. Such rights and privileges include the right to love, affection and fair treatment from the parents. Additionally, the children share equal inheritance rights from the adopting parents. The government safeguards such rights in the constitution thus giving adopted children an advantage in case of a contravention of any of such rights. Adoption is a contemporary necessity resulting from lifestyle relativities. Parents have varying reasons for adopting children. Among the most common reasons given by adopting parents, include the failure of such couples to have children. Such parents may therefore make the decision to adopt a child from any parent within the society willing to relinquish their biological parental rights. Despite the process being an agreement between the two par ties, the legislations safeguard the agreement by providing details that each party to ascribe to in order to maintain the subsequent conflict of interests that arise because of the complications of the process. In most cases, the government always denies certain parents their parenting rights in cases where the parents portray negligence. The state houses such children in homes and orphanages thus making the available for adoptions. Another fundamental reason that has contributed to the rise of adoption in the contemporary society is same sex marriages (Silverstein and Roszia 41). The rise of gay marriages has contributed to the increase of adoption cases since such parents cannot biologically bear children of their own. In retrospect, adoption is a personal decision that couples make on their own. In certain cases, the adopting parents always have children of their own but for reasons best known to them decide to adopt other children. The law therefore establishes the process and nature of adoption in order to protect the interests of each party involved in the adoption process. The adopted children must for example feel the parental love from their new parents and have their right and privileges protected. N case of a separation of the couples, the law explains whatever happens to the children owing to the fact that they are part of the family. The parents must provide for them despite their separations. There are two main types of adoption applicable in the modern societies. These include domestic and foreign adoptions. Domestic adoption refers to an adoption in which both the adopted child and the adopting paren